A great. The relationship anywhere between recombination frequency and you will hereditary distance for the eukaryotes

E. (1952)

Jevons, Yards. P., and you will Parker, Meters. T. (1964). J. din. Path., 17, 243-250. Lidwell, 0. Yards. (1959). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 18,49-52. Real time, We., and you can Nichols, A beneficial. C. (1961).J. shoot. Dis.,108, 195-204. Macdonald, A. (1946). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 5, 230-233. Meyer, W. (1966). Zentbl. Bukt. PurusitKde., I . Abt. Orig., 201,465-481. Meyer, W. (1967). J. Hyg., Camb., 65,439-447. Nakagawa, Yards. (1960). Jap. J. moist. Res., 8, 331-342. Oeding, P., and Williams, R. Age. 0. (1958). step three. Hyg., Cumb., 56, 445-454. Pagano, J. S., Farrer, S. Yards., Plotkin, S. Good., Brachman, P. S., Fekety, F. R., and you may Pidcoe, V. (1960). Technology, N.Y., 131, 927-928. Parker, Yards. T. (1966). During the “The fresh Scientific Foundation from Drug Yearly Comment” (J. P. Ross, ed.), pp. 157-173. University away from London area, The new Athlone Push, London area. Parker, Yards. T., Todinson, An excellent. J. H., and you can Williams, Roentgen. E. 0. (1955). J. Hyg., Cumb., 53,458-473.

Brand new parasexual duration as well as include in genetic data

Pether, J. V. S. (1968).J. Hyg., C a d . , 66,605. Poole, P. Meters., and you can Baker, J. Roentgen. (1966). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., twenty-five, 116-123. Statement (1959). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl.,9, 115-118. Statement (1963). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl., 13, 119-122. Statement (1967). Int. Bull. buct. Nomencl., 17, 113-125. Declaration (1971). Int. Bull. syst. Buct., 21, 165 sitio de citas para gamers gratis, 167, 171. Rountree, P. M. (1959). J. gen. Microbiol., 20,620-633. Rountree, P. Meters., and Asheshov, E. H. (1961). J. gen. Microbiol., twenty-six, 111-122. Rountree, P. Meters., and you can Freeman, B. M. (1955). Med. J. Aust., dos, 157-161. Ruys, A beneficial. C., and Borst, J. (1959). Antonie wan Leeuwenhoek, twenty-five, 237-240. Seto, J. T., and you can Wilson, J. B. (1958). Are.step 3. moist. Res., 19, 241-246. Smith, H. W. (1948a).J. Hyg., C u d . , 46,7681. Smith, H. W. (1948b);Jp. Path. Ther., 58, 179-188. Smith, H. W. (1954).J. Street. Buc

Tarr, H. A good. (1958). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 17, 64-72. Watson, W. A good. (1965). Vet. Rec., 77, 477-480. Wentworth, B., Romig, W. R., and you may Dixon, W. J. (1964). J. infect. Dis.,114, 179188.

Williams, R. E. 0. (1957). Zentbl. Bakt. PurasitKde., I . Abt. Orig., 168, 528-532. Williams, R. Age. O., and you can Jevons, M. P. (1961). Zentbl. Bukt. ParasitKde., I Abt. Orig., 181,349-358. Williams, R. Age. O., and you can Rippon, J. J. Hyg., Camb., 50, 320-353. Williams, Roentgen. E. O., Rippon, J. E., and you will Dowsett, L. Yards. (1953). Lancet, i, 510-514. Wilson, Grams. S., and you may Atkinson, J. D. (1945). Lancet, i, 647-649.

Genetic Analysis for the Micro-bacteria DAVID An effective. HOPWOOD John Znnes Institute, Norwikh, The united kingdomt I. Addition . 11. Segregation just like the Proof of Easy Genetic Handle . A good. The newest genetic method to biology . B. The newest recognition out of segregation . 111. The foundation out of Genetic Mapping . B. The latest sequencing out of loci for the good linkage map: multi-foundation crosses C. Linkagegroups . D. Genetic fine-build . Elizabeth. Removal mapping . IV. Useful Hereditary Examination . A great. Popularity examination . Bplementation tests . C. Epistasis . V. Hereditary Study into the Eukaryotic Microorganisms . An effective. General considerations . 1. dos. Tetrad data . B. Genetic studies specifically organisms step one. Aspergillus nidulans . . dos. Aspergillus niger or other “imperfect” fungi 3. Neurospora crassa . cuatro. Other ascomycetes . 5. Yeasts . 6. Filamentous basidiomycetes . 7. Ustilago . 8. Chlamydomonas reinhardii . 9. Ciliates . ten. Slime moulds VI. Genetic Study for the Prokaryotes . An excellent. General factors . step one. Fertility designs and conjugational mapping . 2. Transduction and you will co-transduction . 3. Transformation and co-transformation cuatro. Non-choosy investigation .

50 51 57 61 61 65 66 69 69 73 75 77 78 80 81 81 83 84 91 94

Genetic study particularly bacteria 1. Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium or other Enteric bacterium . 2. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Ps. putida . 3. Bacillus subtilis cuatro. Streptmyces coelicolor and other actinomycetes . 5. Other germs C. Certified mapping measures separate away from recombination VII. Hereditary Investigation when you look at the Viruses An excellent. General factors . 1. Variety of viral genomes 2. Bells and whistles from virus genetics B. Genetic research particularly viruses 1. Bacteriophages 2. Creature worms step three. Plant viruses VIII. Concluding Statements Records .